🔗 Share this article

Only two days prior to the New York race for mayor, Michael Lange issued a bold forecast – going beyond the winner overall, and block by block. The analyst, an expert in elections who grew up in New York City, has spent more than ten years in progressive politics and has become something of a well-known figure this year for his deep dives into city data and polling.

He published his highly detailed forecast map – accurately predicting that the progressive candidate was victorious although failed to predict the independent candidate’s strong performance – on his newsletter, his platform. He possesses a talent for clever terms. He highlighted, as an example, the divide between the “commie corridor”, running from Park Slope to Bushwick to Astoria, where he forecasted (accurately) that the left-wing candidate would triumph by huge margins, and the conservative-leaning zone on affluent parts of Manhattan. There, “the Free Press and Wall Street Journal outrank the New York Times” in audience and the majority of electors favored the independent, who ran as a moderate alternative.

Election Night Trends and Unexpected Results

What was your night?

I had to do that since they were adding approximately 200K ballots into the tally every few minutes! I was actually a little nervous initially: The candidate was ahead the early vote by 12 points, but there were two big batches of ballots that came in after that and the advantage went from 12% to 8%. It was concerning.

You know, there was a world in which yesterday went somewhat badly for Mamdani, in which Cuomo was going to end up essentially increasing his support from the Democratic primary. However the winner added half a million votes to his initial base, and that’s a huge reason why he won. He went out and massively expanded his support from the primary.

Coalition Building

Where did the mayor-elect gain additional support from?

He built the alliance that the left long aimed for: it’s multiracial, it’s young, tenants and it’s people facing cost pressures. He gained considerably with minority communities, working- and middle-class voters, compared to the primary. Plus he further maximized his core of liberal progressives, youthful radicals, and Muslims and south Asians. He couldn’t have won without making those significant inroads.

He created the coalition that progressives long aimed for: diverse, young, renters and residents struggling with costs

There were also a number of Trump/Mamdani voters – is that a big trend?

It’s definitely a genuine phenomenon, confined to Hispanic laborers, south Asians and Islamic voters. Voters in ethnic enclaves that supported the former president last year backed the progressive now. But it’s not that he was gaining white working-class voters and Trump loyalists.

Voter Participation and Impact

A major development of the night was the sky-high participation. Who benefited?

Each candidate. Participation was much greater than anticipated. I thought we might exceed 2 million, but it reached 2.3M – that is a lot of darn voters. Existed a decent anti-Mamdani block, who were motivated, but the Mamdani base was equally driven, and that sufficed to secure victory.

You predicted he’d exceed half the ballots. Is he likely for that?

Right now it appears he’s favored to surpass 50%. He has 50.4% but remain around 200K ballots left to report at that time. So I don’t think certain, but I believe probable, and I wish he does so then no one can say Sliwa was a spoiler.

Republican Collapse

The GOP candidate, the conservative contender, is the other big story. His vote completely collapsed.

He didn’t win a single precinct in any borough. Including one neighborhood in the borough, which is like an highly conservative neighborhood. That truly surprised me. Cuomo held very white areas, very wealthy areas and devout communities, and plus gained many Republicans on Staten Island who had a strong turnout. I think there was significant tactical voting by GOP voters. This happened before the former president tweeted his support for the candidate, but that definitely helped. It might have changed the outcome unless Mamdani’s coalition hadn’t grown.

The “Commie Corridor”

Regarding your often-discussed left-wing base – did backing for Mamdani dominant in those areas of the boroughs?

In my view there was a little dilution of the commie corridor in certain places like neighborhoods that have more older white ethnic folks. In Astoria, for example, the property owners and homeowners all went for Cuomo. Thus there existed some opposition. However overall, mostly the leftist base is a key factor why Zohran prevailed – he scored between 77% and 83% in specific neighborhoods.

Community Support

In the lead-up to the vote we reported on if the candidate was making inroads with Jewish New Yorkers. Any indication that he succeeded?

Exist neighborhoods with a lot of non-religious and left-inclined voters – like specific locales – where he did well. But in the wealthy Jewish communities such as the Upper East Side, his position on Israel was influential in those places. Likewise in the more middle-class Jewish areas including Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Bronx areas – they all leaned Cuomo. Plus, you have newcomers from the former Soviet Union in the borough, who were pretty staunchly supportive. So I don’t know if existed crazy narrative-busters on this one, but he retained left-leaning areas and including sections of the Upper West Side by big margins.

Political Impact

Has Mamdani rewritten what the city means politically? Will commie corridor become a launch pad for progressive contenders?

Yes, it’s not accidental that some of the biggest political leaders from the left come from a handful of neighborhoods in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I’m sure that there will be additional examples – candidates will emerge from these areas to be elevated nationally.

But I think that each urban center in the US can have their own commie corridor. Urban places are the epicenters of leftwing power in America – because youth reside there, people rent and they represent locales where people are crushed by the disparities we face.